Addressing Pride

I am not sure how many of you read the Lexington Herald Leader but they ran an interesting article last Saturday.  The article, “Gay pride event banners hit Lexington streets,” covers the banners for the Lexington Pride Festival which have been placed in downtown Lexington.  The Lexington Pride Festival has been held annually for the past twenty years and this is the first time it has been held publicly; until this year it was held on private farms.  Not surprisingly the banners have drawn criticism.  But how should you respond?

Should you send angry letters or perhaps make a phone call to express your disapproval or should you make signs and join the “pro-Jesus” picketers who will likely protest the event or maybe you should sit at home and pretend that Lexington’s gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community does not exist?

I hope you respond and I hope the church responds quite differently than the various scenarios listed above.  Before I address how you should respond it is appropriate to briefly examine how Jesus reacted to “sinners” in His own day.  First, Jesus was broken and filled with compassion: “When he saw the crowds, he had compassion for them, because they were harassed and helpless, like sheep without a shepherd” (Matthew 9:36).  Second, He befriended them and spent intimate time with them: “And as Jesus reclined at table in the house, behold, many tax collectors and sinners came and were reclining with Jesus and his disciples” (Matthew 9:10).  Third, He developed such close relationships with them that the self-righteous religious outsiders viewed Him as one of them: “The Son of Man came eating and drinking, and they say, ‘Look at him! A glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners!’” (Matthew 11:19a). Finally, denying the religious elite the preeminence which they felt they had earned He directed the whole of His ministry to calling sinners to unite with Him in repentance: “I have not come to call the righteous but sinners to repentance” (Luke 5:32).

While that was certainly not an exhaustive examination of Christ’s reaction to such individuals it provides several key principles that should guide your life.  First, your reaction to gross immorality and sin must not be anger and rage directed at the individuals involved but brokenness and compassion.  Christ saw the crowds as “sheep without a shepherd” as being utterly defenseless before the countless predators devouring them; you too must see the world through the eyes of Christ.  Second, you must not withdraw from social outcasts and sinners but spend intentional time cultivating intimate relationships with them.  Christ relaxed with, ate with, drank with, and built such relationships with sinners and tax collectors to the degree that He was viewed as one of them.  If Christ were to have been born today’s context it seems likely that the religious elite would consider Him to be a “homosexual drunk and a friend of sinners and the worst kinds of social outcasts.”  Finally, in the context of broken compassion and in relationship you must lovingly and sincerely call such individuals to repentance.  By repentance I do not mean the social gospel repentance of external forms where you tell individuals to stop all behavior that you are not comfortable with but genuine repentance and submission to the Lordship of Christ.

Where do these principles leave you?  Maybe you should do something different and spend time meeting people who are not like you and go to the festival.  Maybe you should look at the countless individuals that your local church is not reaching and whose lifestyle your political activism will not change.  Maybe you should go and see the countless individuals who are like “sheep without a shepherd” and feel compassion for them.  Maybe you should look at the countless hate-filled self-righteous protestors and be filled with indignation over their misrepresentation of the gospel and their spirit of antichrist.  Maybe you should go and make a friend.  Maybe you know someone from Lexington’s gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community who you have ostracized because of their sexual preference and you need to ask for their forgiveness and seek reconciliation.  Maybe you should take your children and teach them how to love individuals who are not like you and explain to them why God killed His only Son so that He could reconcile those individuals to Himself.  Maybe you should take your children and teach your children of the inadequacy of social and political reform and explain how and why they should give their lives to living and proclaiming the gospel of Jesus Christ.

“For our sake he made him sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God.” ― II Corinthians 5:21

2008-06-13 The Brief

. . . . I said no more posts on politics and here I am in the same week doing another post on politics.  Honestly, I have written so much on this lately because I feel that the church has lost her mission (II Corinthians 10:3-5).  Below are two series of posts one by John MacArthur, at Pulpit Magazine, and the other by Phil Johnson, at Pyromaniacs.  I am posting these not to correct the churches understanding of politics, although I think these posts will serve well to do that, but to call the church to repent of her folly and reclaim her mission.

John MacArthur

Phil Johnson

A Missionary God

The Living God is a Missionary God” by John R. W. Stott is a fantastic article detailing the theme of mission in Scripture.  The article is very short and provides two discussion questions at the end.  I would appreciate it if you would be willing to read the article, answer the two questions, and then share any other thoughts you have concerning the article.  The article is the first chapter in Perspectives on the World Christian Movement: A Reader, which I would recommend to anyone who wants to gain a serious understanding of missions.  You can also check out the Perspectives website for more information.

2008-05-30 The Brief

Blogroll

Eric Bryant did an interesting post a while back entitled Why Homophobia is So Gay.  I think he offers some good insight into how we should handle what I expect to be an inevitable norm, not just in America but globally as well.  As for me I think we need to start thinking beyond constitutional amendments if we hope to engage this and a host of other issues that are on the horizon.  I have not listened to the sermons that his post links to, although if I ever have the time, which I doubt, I will listen to them and post my thoughts here.

Derek Brown has done a fantastic post detailing How to Waste Your Theological Education this is a must read for all who are currently attending or plan to attend seminary.

Ed Stetzer (also here) discusses technology in the church and has some good insights as well as some great questions for discussion in his recent post Technolochurch.

 

Israel

First Things has an interesting and incredibly lengthy article entitled Zionism for Christians.

Just for Fun

Condoleezza Rice joins the Kiss Army.

Simply Amazing

Write Your Senator!

For those of you who actually read Missio Dei I hope the title of this post was to some degree surprising or shocking.  If you are not familiar with my perspective on politics I would recommend reading Meaning versus Significance: Hermeneutics and Evangelical Political Activism I think it is a clear and concise explanation of where I stand.

So why am I encouraging you to write your senator?

The Kentucky primaries are coming up soon, this week actually, and I am sure there are some interesting things to vote for this time around.  Over the years I have heard countless individuals encourage me to “vote my conscience,” to “oppose what God opposes,” to “stand for what is right,” and other “evangelical” idioms.  Believe it or not I take these things very seriously and this has caused me to ponder how this should be applied in American politics.

But first let us read Scripture . . .

 “These twelve Jesus sent out, instructing them, ‘Go nowhere among the Gentiles and enter no town of the Samaritans, but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. . . . . And if anyone will not receive you or listen to your words, shake off the dust from your feet when you leave that house or town.  Truly, I say to you, it will be more bearable on the day of judgment for the land of Sodom and Gomorrah than for that town’” (Matthew 10:5-6, 14-15).

“Do you suppose, O man—you who judge those who practice such things and yet do them yourself—that you will escape the judgment of God?  Or do you presume on the riches of his kindness and forbearance and patience, not knowing that God’s kindness is meant to lead you to repentance?  But because of your hard and impenitent heart you are storing up wrath for yourself on the day of wrath when God’s righteous judgment will be revealed” (Romans 2:3-5).

What merits a judgment worse than that of Sodom and Gomorrah?  What heinous act not only deserves judgment but actually stores up wrath?

Answering these questions brings us full circle to answering the questions posed in the beginning of this post.  You should write your senator and propose a constitutional amendment that bans, not gay marriage or abortion or gambling, but nominal hypocritical self-righteous “christianity.”  That is what God hates.  If you want to uphold American morality then you should write your senator urging him/her to oppose the greatest moral failure in the history of America nominal Christianity.