<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Missio Dei</title>
	<atom:link href="http://keithwalters.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://keithwalters.org</link>
	<description>For the earth will be filled with the knowledge of the glory of the LORD as the waters cover the sea.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:41:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Acts 8:26-40: Philip and the Sexual Deviant Part 2 — Responding to Alternate Interpretations by Tidbits Tuesday – Links for Acts 8 &#171; provPRESS</title>
		<link>http://keithwalters.org/2009/07/23/acts-826-40-philip-and-the-sexual-deviant-part-2-%e2%80%94-responding-to-alternate-interpretations/#comment-1541</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tidbits Tuesday – Links for Acts 8 &#171; provPRESS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keithwalters.org/?p=458#comment-1541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Acts 8:26-40: Philip and the Sexual Deviant Part 2 — Responding to Alternate Interpretations Share this:EmailFacebookTwitterStumbleUponLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post.   &#160; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Acts 8:26-40: Philip and the Sexual Deviant Part 2 — Responding to Alternate Interpretations Share this:EmailFacebookTwitterStumbleUponLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post.   &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Acts 8:26-40: Philip and the Sexual Deviant by Tidbits Tuesday – Links for Acts 8 &#171; provPRESS</title>
		<link>http://keithwalters.org/2009/03/11/acts-826-40-philip-and-the-sexual-deviant/#comment-1540</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tidbits Tuesday – Links for Acts 8 &#171; provPRESS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keithwalters.org/?p=387#comment-1540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Acts 8:26-40: Philip and the Sexual Deviant [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Acts 8:26-40: Philip and the Sexual Deviant [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Abortion and the Illusion of Sovereignty: Addressing the Real Issue by Randy Alan Donahue</title>
		<link>http://keithwalters.org/2011/08/17/abortion-and-the-illusion-of-sovereignty-addressing-the-real-issue/#comment-1522</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randy Alan Donahue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 19:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keithwalters.org/?p=531#comment-1522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for this powerful article. Your last paragraph sums up many of the problems I see in the church today. We are pursuing a &quot;social gospel&quot; - thinking we can elect the right official, protest in the right way at the right place, or pass a law that will fix things. That will never be the solution. The only solution to the sinful action of man is the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this powerful article. Your last paragraph sums up many of the problems I see in the church today. We are pursuing a &#8220;social gospel&#8221; &#8211; thinking we can elect the right official, protest in the right way at the right place, or pass a law that will fix things. That will never be the solution. The only solution to the sinful action of man is the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Abortion and the Illusion of Sovereignty: Addressing the Real Issue by Keith Walters</title>
		<link>http://keithwalters.org/2011/08/17/abortion-and-the-illusion-of-sovereignty-addressing-the-real-issue/#comment-1518</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keith Walters]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 20:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keithwalters.org/?p=531#comment-1518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think in a way we have to turn that question on its head.  Rather than those statistics driving the question “Why does God murder so many children?” we have to instead ask “Why does God allow any of our children, or us for that matter, to live?”  The answer to that takes us back again to the way that God responds to humanity’s first act of false sovereignty in the garden.  God allows us rebels to live and give birth to our rebellious little children because He is gracious and is about the task of redeeming rebels and restoring the whole of His creation, which has been ravaged by our rebellion, in the person of Jesus Christ.  In short the real infanticide question is “Why did God kill His Son?” and the answer is so our sons and daughters might live.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think in a way we have to turn that question on its head.  Rather than those statistics driving the question “Why does God murder so many children?” we have to instead ask “Why does God allow any of our children, or us for that matter, to live?”  The answer to that takes us back again to the way that God responds to humanity’s first act of false sovereignty in the garden.  God allows us rebels to live and give birth to our rebellious little children because He is gracious and is about the task of redeeming rebels and restoring the whole of His creation, which has been ravaged by our rebellion, in the person of Jesus Christ.  In short the real infanticide question is “Why did God kill His Son?” and the answer is so our sons and daughters might live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Abortion and the Illusion of Sovereignty: Addressing the Real Issue by JTapp</title>
		<link>http://keithwalters.org/2011/08/17/abortion-and-the-illusion-of-sovereignty-addressing-the-real-issue/#comment-1514</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JTapp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keithwalters.org/?p=531#comment-1514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post, it&#039;s been too long since you&#039;ve blogged.  I like that last paragraph.  

In the comments of a similar post elsewhere I noticed a pro-choice person making the point that 10-25% of pregnancies end in miscarriage.  The commenter asked &quot;Why does God murder so many children?&quot; I found I didn&#039;t have a comment-conducive response for this.  I think the simplest response would be &quot;God is sovereign over the biology, and you don&#039;t have the right to question his actions, nor do you have the right to try and play God over your own biology, deciding which baby doesn&#039;t make it to term.&quot; 
What do you think?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, it&#8217;s been too long since you&#8217;ve blogged.  I like that last paragraph.  </p>
<p>In the comments of a similar post elsewhere I noticed a pro-choice person making the point that 10-25% of pregnancies end in miscarriage.  The commenter asked &#8220;Why does God murder so many children?&#8221; I found I didn&#8217;t have a comment-conducive response for this.  I think the simplest response would be &#8220;God is sovereign over the biology, and you don&#8217;t have the right to question his actions, nor do you have the right to try and play God over your own biology, deciding which baby doesn&#8217;t make it to term.&#8221;<br />
What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bottoms Up: The Lost Art of Moderation by Russ Leonard</title>
		<link>http://keithwalters.org/2010/06/28/bottoms-up-the-lost-art-of-moderation/#comment-1443</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russ Leonard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 02:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keithwalters.org/?p=510#comment-1443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Keith,

I just finish reading Church 3.0 by Neil Cole and much of what I shared is in one of the later chapters of the book.  Of course Neil&#039;s is well thought out and organized with life examples compared to my rambling.  It is an excellent read.  One of the best chapters examines the different churches in the NT and challenges the premise that the church in Jerusalem is the &quot;model church&quot; for us to follow today.

Take care brother,
Russ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith,</p>
<p>I just finish reading Church 3.0 by Neil Cole and much of what I shared is in one of the later chapters of the book.  Of course Neil&#8217;s is well thought out and organized with life examples compared to my rambling.  It is an excellent read.  One of the best chapters examines the different churches in the NT and challenges the premise that the church in Jerusalem is the &#8220;model church&#8221; for us to follow today.</p>
<p>Take care brother,<br />
Russ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bottoms Up: The Lost Art of Moderation by Keith Walters</title>
		<link>http://keithwalters.org/2010/06/28/bottoms-up-the-lost-art-of-moderation/#comment-1442</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keith Walters]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keithwalters.org/?p=510#comment-1442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Russ,
Thank you for your comment.  I am glad this is an issue that people are starting to think through and discuss.  I was first introduced to the communion as feast concept by Neil Cole and Alan Hirsch and it challenged me greatly.  In “Organic Church” Cole challenged me with his explanation of why we need to understand the gospel as a means of proclaiming and illustrating the gospel for those who do not know Christ.  I hope to see more churches celebrating communion as a meal.  I am still wrestling with the idea of including those outside of the covenant community in communion but I think this passage in Deuteronomy does indicate that others were included in the feast in celebration of Yahweh’s redemptive grace.  “Organic Church” was the first book that I have read to suggest this are there any resources that you would recommend reading on this issue?

EnnisP,
Thank you for the encouraging words.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ,<br />
Thank you for your comment.  I am glad this is an issue that people are starting to think through and discuss.  I was first introduced to the communion as feast concept by Neil Cole and Alan Hirsch and it challenged me greatly.  In “Organic Church” Cole challenged me with his explanation of why we need to understand the gospel as a means of proclaiming and illustrating the gospel for those who do not know Christ.  I hope to see more churches celebrating communion as a meal.  I am still wrestling with the idea of including those outside of the covenant community in communion but I think this passage in Deuteronomy does indicate that others were included in the feast in celebration of Yahweh’s redemptive grace.  “Organic Church” was the first book that I have read to suggest this are there any resources that you would recommend reading on this issue?</p>
<p>EnnisP,<br />
Thank you for the encouraging words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bottoms Up: The Lost Art of Moderation by EnnisP</title>
		<link>http://keithwalters.org/2010/06/28/bottoms-up-the-lost-art-of-moderation/#comment-1441</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EnnisP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 06:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keithwalters.org/?p=510#comment-1441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post! I was once in the legalistic camp but through hard experience, as well as honest reflections on passages such as the one you mentioned, moved to a more centralized position.  

Before reaching this place I actually wrote a book arguing that alcohol of any kind for any reason, other than medicinal, was biblically disallowed.  Points in the book are still useful for encouraging moderation but I no longer consider prohibition a worthy cause.

Thanks for writing]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post! I was once in the legalistic camp but through hard experience, as well as honest reflections on passages such as the one you mentioned, moved to a more centralized position.  </p>
<p>Before reaching this place I actually wrote a book arguing that alcohol of any kind for any reason, other than medicinal, was biblically disallowed.  Points in the book are still useful for encouraging moderation but I no longer consider prohibition a worthy cause.</p>
<p>Thanks for writing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bottoms Up: The Lost Art of Moderation by Russ Leonard</title>
		<link>http://keithwalters.org/2010/06/28/bottoms-up-the-lost-art-of-moderation/#comment-1440</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russ Leonard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 03:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keithwalters.org/?p=510#comment-1440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Keith- I just read your first and second post on alcohol and I think both are great.  I would like to comment on the Lord&#039;s Supper since the wine and the blood are so intricately connected.  Jesus talked a lot about us eating, drinking and feasting on Him.  The passage in John where he states that we must eat his flesh and drink his blood was revolting enough to turn many away.  

Communion was meant to be so much more than it is today.  It was meant to be a feast with Christ at the center.  The symbolism is so strong that it is meant to be used in sharing the good news with those over a meal and was never meant to exclude non believers.  Jesus himself, shared the meal along with many other meals with Judas.  He had used the same terminology throughout his ministry so that the  final meal was the finishing touch on what the feast was meant to represent.  Jesus was consistent in his ministry with the breaking of bread and then talking about how it represented His life

We no longer have a feast but we have a tiny wafer a cup of grape juice.  Plus we exclude people from partaking of the feast based on a passage in 1 Corinthians 11 that was written to believers as a warning not to exclude other believers from the feast.  There were believers even getting sick and some died as a result of not sharing in the feast.

Most inward practices within the church need to return to their outward meaningful purpose.  Normal everyday Christians need to think about how Lord&#039;s supper can be an opportunity to share with their neighbors in the giving and breaking of bread.  It is a natural way to share the gospel in a non threatening manner.  

It doesn&#039;t take a priest to bless the bread and grape juice!  Lest we forget just before the Lord&#039;s supper that our Lord commanded us not to Lord it over one another as the disciples to see who was the greatest.  

Thanks again Keith for your boldness!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith- I just read your first and second post on alcohol and I think both are great.  I would like to comment on the Lord&#8217;s Supper since the wine and the blood are so intricately connected.  Jesus talked a lot about us eating, drinking and feasting on Him.  The passage in John where he states that we must eat his flesh and drink his blood was revolting enough to turn many away.  </p>
<p>Communion was meant to be so much more than it is today.  It was meant to be a feast with Christ at the center.  The symbolism is so strong that it is meant to be used in sharing the good news with those over a meal and was never meant to exclude non believers.  Jesus himself, shared the meal along with many other meals with Judas.  He had used the same terminology throughout his ministry so that the  final meal was the finishing touch on what the feast was meant to represent.  Jesus was consistent in his ministry with the breaking of bread and then talking about how it represented His life</p>
<p>We no longer have a feast but we have a tiny wafer a cup of grape juice.  Plus we exclude people from partaking of the feast based on a passage in 1 Corinthians 11 that was written to believers as a warning not to exclude other believers from the feast.  There were believers even getting sick and some died as a result of not sharing in the feast.</p>
<p>Most inward practices within the church need to return to their outward meaningful purpose.  Normal everyday Christians need to think about how Lord&#8217;s supper can be an opportunity to share with their neighbors in the giving and breaking of bread.  It is a natural way to share the gospel in a non threatening manner.  </p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t take a priest to bless the bread and grape juice!  Lest we forget just before the Lord&#8217;s supper that our Lord commanded us not to Lord it over one another as the disciples to see who was the greatest.  </p>
<p>Thanks again Keith for your boldness!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Acts 8:26-40: Philip and the Sexual Deviant Part 2 — Responding to Alternate Interpretations by Keith Walters</title>
		<link>http://keithwalters.org/2009/07/23/acts-826-40-philip-and-the-sexual-deviant-part-2-%e2%80%94-responding-to-alternate-interpretations/#comment-1433</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keith Walters]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 03:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keithwalters.org/?p=458#comment-1433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Keith!  BTW you have a great name ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Keith!  BTW you have a great name ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

